Alien Baby Born To Female Cosmonaut In Space?

American Satellite Launch
Photo Source: NASA

From time to time, some of the ideas from articles that I have written have been picked up by tabloids. The only reason that I know about this is that they have been pointed out to me by others. The only reason that I mention this, is that my wife walked in with one of these paper which I NEVER read. She had folded it back to a particular article and left in on the table and I just happened to see it. The article caught my eye. I have never commented on one of these articles, but this one was unique. It stated that the Russians had secretly sent 3 women into space and that they had been there for 14 months without men, yet one of them got pregnant. It went on to say that the baby appears to be of extraterrestrial origin and has the powers of clairvoyance and psychokinesis, which is the power to move objects by thinking about them.

I decided that I had to try and research this article. I spent hours and couldn't even verify the fact that there were any women in space. In all fairness, the article did state that this was a secret mission and was being kept secret, because it violated the agreement between the US and Russia regarding the maintenance of the International Space Station (ISS)? This statement raised red flags in my mind. What did the Russians orbiting cosmonauts have to do with the ISS? I could understand if they, the Russians, didn't meet their quota of inspections and repairs, or didn't send ships when they were supposed to, but when I read this, it didn't seem to make sense to me. Why would only 3 women be in space? I started to think about this. Maybe it had something to do with human development. It could have been a test of some sort of fertilization, to see if it was possible for artificial insemination to work in space?

You have to wonder though, how come I can't find anything about this anywhere except in that tabloid, when I wrote this article on January 27, 2010? Wouldn't a satellite circling the earth be noticed, especially one that is said to have been orbiting for so long? Wouldn't just that fact have alerted someone? We are not even talking about being on a space station here, but rather locked into some satellite for all that time. This in itself makes the story seem all that more absurd. Can you imagine being locked into a small satellite with 2 other people for over a year, without wanting to kill somebody? I think that in order for this story to gain credence there are some questions that would have to be answered.

One of the main questions that I would love to ask about this flight, if indeed it even exists, is how did they get enough food and supplies aboard a satellite for such an extended flight for 3 people? Granted women probably eat less than men, but still it seems impossible. Because of this, my question would be, has a supply ship docked with the station, one that had a pilot and/or crew? I think that you know what I am getting at here. Even though there were supposedly no men aboard the satellite, why couldn't it be possible that one of the supply crew had sex with the female cosmonaut and she conceived a baby? According to the article the gestation period was said to have been about 12 months. The paper is making a big deal out of this and intimating that the baby was carried for 12 months by the mother. I say that I would like to know if a supply ship came to the satellite after 3 months, because it seems to me that the most food and water a craft of this size could hold would be about 90 days for a crew of three.

Getting back to why this satellite doesn't seem to have been observed by anyone, there could be several reasons. The first and most plausible one, is that there is no satellite. Another reason might be that it is using the new stealth technology that can hide anything and the third reason is that we did know that it was there, but the government and NASA remained silent about it for some reason. There have been secret missions before, both by the US and Russia and I am sure we would have considered this just another one of those and maybe we wouldn't let the secret out, because we are also conducting secret missions that we want to keep from the public.

Now about the baby, it is oh so easy to blame aliens for almost anything that happens. One sees it all the time on the Internet. Whenever anything happens out of the ordinary, there are always those that blame the aliens for it, why should this be any different, especially by a paper that is trying to sell as much copy as they can? They just love to put up those sensational headlines that attract supermarket shoppers to their junk. Headlines like, “Wolfman attacks village”, or “Gorillas knock on doors looking for lost baby”, are commonly seen adorning the first page of these tabloids.

One thing that I have noticed is that these types of papers never let the truth get in their way. It seems that some people like to read them for entertainment value, but not many take them at face value. Its more like reading an entertaining story that everyone knows probably isn't true. I had done an interview with a certain scientist and a week later it was used for a story in which they completely turned around what he had told me and tried to ridicule him. What they wrote was entirely false and the only way I found out about it was my wife had bought that paper and mentioned it to me. I know that these types of papers can never be taken as reference material, but it would certainly be nice if they expanded on the data in their articles. It would have been nice to know the name of that supposed woman cosmonaut that was said to be pregnant, along with why they did violate the US Russian agreement? It would have also been nice to know if any supply ships, or maintenance ships visited them? Lastly it would have been nice to know who validated the fact that the baby had special powers?