Free File Viewers For Movies, Photos, Audio, PDF, Word Clone

FILE VIEWER INFO

ARTICLE COMMENT By Email - On Discussion Board

 

In the last year and a half, since I decided that interviewing interesting people from different fields, but mostly UFO investigators, would be informative, I have learned a lot. Its funny how you think that you know all the facts about something and then BANG, a fact so interesting as to change you entire perception of a story shows up. So far I have interviewed people in the fields of UFO investigation, an alien implant victim, a doctor that removes alien implants, several authors, a magician, an inventor, a couple of ex NASA engineers, an expert on air powered cars, a paranormal investigator and a scientist working on a time machine. This is a pretty varied bunch of people. I must say that they were all very nice and above all, very interesting. I am still in contact with a couple of them and they have been very helpful with the odd question that might come up in their field. If you think that you can talk to this many experts and not learn anything, you would be dead wrong.

One of the things that I learned was that a beam from a UFO was able to go through a Russian soldier without hurting him and blow up an advanced high powered radar station behind him. Why would a UFO want to do something like blowing up a radar station, they have all been painted as peaceful? While I can not state the reason with absolute certainty, I can say that high powered Russian radar was said to be able to take down a UFO by interfering with their propulsion systems and the Russians were supposedly using the radar as a weapon against UFOs. I guess that this would be reason enough for an attack of this nature. There is also the fact that the Russians, like ourselves, had orders to shoot down UFOs and had been chasing them for years and maybe even firing at them, before this attack. That alone could be a reason, but I think my first reason is more valid because of the target that was singled out.

One ex NASA engineer and author, told me how a NASA scientist was ordered to destroy all the original photos from the Apollo program and how he just couldn't do it. Instead he brought them home. It just so happens that some of these photos showed anomalies on the moon that would have proved that there were once huge bases, or even cities there and this is being hidden from the general public. He went on to say that the moon looks like it was the victim of a war. From his description it seems that nuclear war was conducted against the bases. One shocking thing that came out of this was that pieces of a robot and its intact head were photographed in a crater. He went on to say that Mars has the same types of ruins. This has to make one think. Where did all these settlements come from. Were there Martians and did they spread out to our moon and maybe even our earth and other places, or did the human race exist and was it far more advanced than today? These are very hard questions to answer.

With all the hoopla about the air powered cars coming, I just had to find out more. It turns out that air power is a viable form of propulsion and if you add about 8 gallons of fuel you can go about 1,000 miles in a small car. Not bad mileage I would say. Without the gasoline the range was about 400 miles I believe. Heating the air got a lot more energy out of it. It is too bad, I was just reading today about the company that was supposed to bring the air powered cars to America, it is in even more dire straits than the auto companies here. There may be no air powered cars brought here because of that. Could it be that since the huge oil companies are the few types of companies with cash, that they will bail out this company on the condition that there will be no air cars? Stranger things have happened, haven't they?

One of my favorite interviews, because of the topic, was with an inventor. He claims to have tapped into a dimension composed of energy, limitless energy. To prove that he has, he runs various experiments using only the energy from the so called energy dimension. When I was preparing for this interview I was not a believer, but as I did more research and started watching videos that were made in front of witnesses showing large objects being lifted, I didn't become a believer instantly, but started to feel more was going on here than I originally thought. I think that the icing on the cake was when I found out that the U.S. military was interested in what this guy was doing. Not only that, but the representative from the military was one of their most renown scientists. Yes something was going on and still is.

Now I don't claim to know a lot about fraudulent photos. It would probably not be to hard to fool me, but a famous UFO photo investigator has made me more aware when I look at UFO photos , or any other type of photos that could be a hoax. He explained how to measure distance from lens to object with a dual lens camera that takes 3D photos, talked about how light hits different parts of the object and how you can tell numerous things about what is in a photo. From time to time I have taken advantage of his good nature and asked him to examine a photo or two I was sent, or a historical photo. I remember sending him an Apollo photo that I thought might prove to be a NASA airbrush job. It turned out I was wrong and what I thought were problems with the photo were only natural things caused by light hitting the camera lens a certain way.

The scientist who is building the time machine is a very interesting guy and a movie is going to be made by Spike Lee about his life. All he wants to do is move one tiny atom or molecule in time. Everything he is doing is to achieve this result. I know that some of the tabloids read my material once in a while, because a few times after I have published an article, an article on the same subject appeared in the next weekly issue. Well I interviewed this guy and it was a very nice interview. He explained everything to me and it made sense when you heard him explain it. He is a PhD and is a professor with a well known university and I am sure that they wouldn't let him proceed if he was a crackpot. Then it happened. About a week later a story came out in a tabloid about him and the headline was, "Scientist wants to build time machine to visit dead father". Oh give me a break, he certainly never said that. All he said was that he missed his dead father, which is far from what the tabloid published.

I have decided to keep going with the interviews. Many people who you least expect to give an interview to a website have been very gracious about it. I am really looking forward to the next interview as the topic is one dear to my heart. It is about all that stuff that archaeologists are not telling us about. What will I learn from this? I can't say right now, but you can bet that something will come up that I never heard before.