Osama bin Laden
Photo Source: FBI

I am writing this article on 2 May, 2011, supposedly a very important day in history. This is the day that we are being told that Osama bin Laden was tracked down and killed by a team of Navy Seals, without any innocents being killed or wounded. We were deprived of seeing the body, and we were told that it was buried at sea so not to create a martyr’s grave. The attack on the Twin World Trade Towers has turned out to be very mysterious. So much about it seems to not fit the story about what happened. I guess that it is fitting that what happened to bin Laden is now mysterious also. When we hear the story of what happened with bin Laden and how fast he was buried and where he was buried, it just has an upsetting tone to it. One can not help but feel that there is a lot more that we are not being told. There are those that feel that bin Laden might have been dead for years and his body frozen to be used for a time when it would be a political advantage to do so. There are others who think that the entire story of his capture is a fabrication and then there are those that feel that bin Laden never really existed and has been used as an excuse to invade Iraq and Afghanistan.

We can not blame people who think this way, because the story of 9/11 that we were told is riddled with so many holes that a Swiss Cheese would look solid next to it. I don't know what the real story is and neither do most of us. We now have two stories that seem bogus. While we may indeed have killed bin Laden, did he really conduct the terror attack in New York City? Was he even capable of coordinating such an attack? If he did, did he also steal the gold that was missing from the vault under one of the towers with all the evidence that was being kept there on different cases? Wait a second, if we believe that he did this and all his men were on planes that crashed, who was left alive to do this and how did they move tons of gold without being seen, gold that would have been buried? Could the gold have been removed BEFORE the attack, thus making it much easier to load it onto trucks and drive away? We hardly ever hear about that gold. Could it be because it would lead us to believe that there was something even more sinister going on that had nothing to do with terrorist groups?

South Tower, World Trade Center
Photo Source: PD (Government Photo)

I remember seeing a movie once where someone wanted to kill a particular person, but didn't want it to look like that person was being targeted. What they did was kill a lot of different people the same way and included this person in the group. This was done to make the crime look like a serial killing, when really they were killing this person because he had evidence against them. Could the whole 9/11 attack have really been to remove evidence on a case against a very powerful individual, or individuals who were perhaps even in our own government in high positions? That would mean that the loss of lives, the destruction of the buildings and the theft of the gold were all done to hide this fact and give even more wealth to these people. Do we believe that after all we have seen in government and mega-corporations that there are not people who are capable of this kind of thing? What better person to blame for an attack like this than a known terrorist. If bin Laden had somehow gotten his hands on this gold, he probably would have been able to purchase at least one nuke or more by now, due to the vast fortune that had been stolen.

As of the day of the writing of this article there is absolutely no proof that has been shown us that would back up the story that bin Laden was killed when we were told he was. As a matter of fact we don't even have any proof that he was killed at all, or that he didn't die of natural causes. If we look at the list of the supposed terrorists that were said to have been on the planes that were said to have crashed into the World Trade Center Towers and examine that list, we see that some of these guys are alive and are legitimate pilots for airlines today, how can that be? I wonder how many people know that there were witnesses to 9/11 who saw a BLACK plane hit the World Trade Center. The video that we were shown shows a commercial airliner making a turn that would have pulled about 6-8 Gs before it hit. That video is not shown anymore and the reason may be that this type of plane could not handle this much of a load. An engine was found in the street, but it did not match the model of the plane that supposedly hit the towers, why?

Pentagon
Photo Source: PD (Government Photo)

It would have been impossible for even the best pilot to fly a huge commercial airliner just a few feet off the ground and crash it into the side of the Pentagon and we know now that no plane was ever found. Bin Laden was supposed to have sent his men to learn how to take off in large commercial aircraft, but takeoff only, not land. We are supposed to believe that these people who could barely take the plane off the ground were so skilled that they could perform a maneuver that no one else could, and that maneuver being to fly a plane at hundreds of miles per hour, almost at ground level and hit the side of a building, the building being the aforesaid Pentagon Building in Washington D.C. I can just see it now, the plotters are in a dark smoky room talking and one says “yeah we can get rid of the evidence against us and make it look like a terrorist attack, after all the people are stupid and will believe anything we tell them”. Another might have said, “and while we are at it, we can take all that gold and use some of it to pay the people off that set things up”. Then the conversation might go on to the plans where someone says, “lets get some ex-military to set charges in the buildings to make sure they come down and bury everything and we have to make sure that they come straight down because then they will crush and bury everything, thus hiding our tracks and we can even blame that guy that screwed us on the last drug or arms deal, what's that terrorist's name again, bin Laden?”

Yeah there is something wrong with the story we have been told about 9/11, or should I say a lot of somethings wrong with it. It now seems that there is something wrong with the story we are being told about bin Laden. If bin Laden was truly killed, was it just the final part of the cover up of 9/11? Could it have been that there are people out there that were afraid that if he was taken alive that he might have said something that might have been believed by some people and could have blown the wraps off of what really happened on that terrible day when we saw two huge buildings full of people go down and a large portion of the New York City Fire Department get wiped out, among others? Bin Laden we are glad you are gone if you really are, but many of us wonder if you really were behind 9/11?