Alternate Beliefs
Alternate explanations for things usually are not very popular. Sometimes I can understand why people think that some of them are totally ridiculous and at other times, it is just a matter of people not being open minded enough. There are many things in our life where the accepted explanation might be wrong, but sometimes this explanation is defended to the death. That usually occurs when people in some profession are worried about their peers ruining their reputation. This is true in many fields, but especially in archeology, paleontology and astronomy, although I could apply it to many other sciences. Others might argue that we are also wrong about ventures that are not so scientific, such as the paranormal. It is true that we are learning more every day and our knowledge is doubling every year and we certainly are going to find out that some of the things that we believe are true, will turn out to be wrong. We can look back in history and see different examples of this. It wasn't that long ago when people were scared to sail too far out into the oceans, because they thought that they might fall off the edge of the earth. They believed that the earth was flat and with all our knowledge today and all our technology and photos of the earth taken from space, there are still a few of these flat earth people around. When you have this much evidence showing this is wrong, then it makes no sense to continue believing these things. I have often talked about the theory of evolution and how those that do not believe in it are laughed at. I have also mention the fact that many different scientific finds in the field of Paleontology have been ignored, or buried in a museum basement somewhere. Evolution may exist for humans, but if it does, it goes much further back than any main stream Paleontologist or Archaeologist cares to admit.
Human Skeleton What is the sense of smothering the truth? Why has the scientific community chosen to hide the fact that there are human skeletons that have been found that are many millions of years old? Why have they also decided to hide the fact that artifacts of human design, that are also millions of year old, have been found? Has the scientific community been asked to keep this stuff secret and if so by who? If the general public realized that the human race was millions of years old and seems to have existed even at the time of the dinosaurs, they might begin to wonder why we have advanced so little in all that time. Yes you read that right, I did say that humans might have existed with the dinosaurs. Evidence has been found in several places where human footprints are right next to those of these beasts and there have been rock paintings found that are at least 25,000 years old that picture dinosaurs with humans. People 25,000 years ago had no way to know what a dinosaur looked like, unless these images were passed down and that means that humans must have been around.
UFO Those photos that were smuggled out of NASA by former employees seem to paint a picture that is different than we have been led to believe. I am referring to those photos that show ruins on the moon. There are ruins of glass domes that covered entire craters, glass structures that are huge and even pieces of machinery and a robot head scattered around in one crater. UFOs are been photographed on the moon. Some of us do not believe that we ever landed on the moon and there is some evidence that would seem to indicate this, while there is also evidence which would seem to indicate that we did. Every time I think that I have proof that there is no doubt that we landed, something else turns up that is just as compelling to show that we didn't. I don't want to go into the latest proof that we didn't land on the moon, because I have an expert coming in for an interview soon that will be telling you all about the evidence he found that seems to indicate that the films of the Apollo landing were a fraud. There are also other things that seem very strange in our history. One is the fact that it seems that a nuclear war may have taken place in our distant past and we are standing on one of the places where it happened, North America. Some researches state that they have proof that the Great Lakes region of the United States was subject to particle bombardment by nuclear irradiation. This ties in with the Vimanas, flying machines that were spoken of thousands of years ago in ancient Indian scripts. If one reads the descriptions of these ships and how they battled each other, only one conclusion can be drawn. They were spaceships and had advanced laser type weapons and nuclear bombs. There is just no way that type of thing could have been described by ancient people who barely had just invented the wheel, unless they saw these things in action. Has there been a war going on here over thousands of years that is now being fought in space? Were those machines piloted by aliens, or were some of us way more advanced than others? If the human race is millions of years old, why couldn't that have been true?
Friendly Aliens This does present a problem for us however, if some of us were far more advanced, where did they go? There are several possibilities that I can think of. They may have decided to go to a different planet to get away from the savages. They might have wiped each other out and those that were left didn't understand their technology enough to recreate it. They could have moved underground, or they could be living with a friendly alien race. If they were advanced enough to have space flight, they may have come in contact with other races on different planets and had some sort of relations with them, much as we have the United Nations here on earth. Here is the favorite theory, they lived on Atlantis and it sunk. The problem with this is that if they all came from Atlantis, who were they fighting? Perhaps it was some alien race who won the battle and eliminated them?
Einstein Lastly, we all believe that time travels in a straight line. Our past is behind us and our future is ahead of us and as time passes, we grow older as we head into the future. Recent studies seem to indicate that this might not be correct. For one thing, the faster we travel, the more time slows down for us. If we spend a lifetime in a speeding car, others who lived for the same amount of time, would be slightly older than us, but time in the car would have slowed down by minute fractions of a second. We know that if we were traveling in a spaceship and going faster than the speed of light, if that is possible, we would age much less than those left on earth. What might seem like a trip that took one year to us, might seems like 20 or more to those left behind. Knowing this, we can see how we can travel into the future. Get enough speed and you can do it, but so far there is no way back. |
Try Our New Discussion Board
