Ancient

We have been told so many things about our roots on this planet, that you would surely think that we actually knew what we were talking about. Why shouldn't people believe archaeologists, when they are told things like the age of man? Shouldn't these professionals with all their experience and all the evidence of those that went before them be able to tell us just about how old our race is and how it evolved? You would think so, wouldn't you? A very strange thing happened to us on our journey for the truth and that thing was Charles Darwin. Before Darwin many scientists believed that the human race was much older than we do today, but the opposite was also true. There were those that thought that humans had only been around for maybe ten thousand years or so.

Darwin Proposed That Animals Like These Are Our Ancestors
Photo Source: Stock.xching

For some strange reason, once Darwin proposed his theory on the evolution of man, it was so thoroughly accepted that in about ten years many dare not go against it, even when evidence presented itself that suggest a far different path. Why did science adopt this theory so fast, after all there had been plenty of other theories in the past? It was accepted because it was neat and science loves neat things. It seemed to show a traceable lineage of different species of hominoids leading up to modern man. When a creationist today espouses that theory, scientists laugh him out of the room and he is called ignorant, but is he or she? It turns out that we have never been allowed to see or hear about all the evidence that has been found that suggests that man is far older than we thought.

Unfortunately there seems to be a down side to this as far as the human race is concerned. Since evidence exists that places humans back in time to perhaps over three hundred million years, this evidence would suggest that man only developed his technology recently and if he was indeed around from before the time of the dinosaurs, he didn't learn very much in that time. Why would humans not develop technology in all that time, then all of a sudden develop it in the last few thousand years? That has to be the most profound question of all.

Ancient Burial
Photo Source: MorgueFile

Could some event have turned all of our brains on? Brains are electrical after all and we are just beginning to understand our brains. Maybe even a chemical reaction could have triggered something that we don't yet understand. Then too, maybe a gene turned on that previously lay dormant. Let's call it the inquisitive gene, for lack of a better word. It might have taken hundreds of millions of years for us to reach that point, even though our ancestors looked just like us. By now you are probably wondering how I can claim that fact, aren't you? Sure you are, admit it, after all the scientific community will tell you that the human race is only about one hundred thousand years old.

Human bones have been found in strata that is easily datable. And predates the time of the dinosaurs. The dirt lay undisturbed for all these hundreds of millions of years. Human bones have also been found in ancient mines that were dug into strata that was at least 10 million years old. Many of them were found in California's gold mines in the middle 1800s. There are many place where the bones of modern humans were found, that according to science shouldn't have been there because we are told that we didn't exist yet. Why weren't these finds made public? They weren't neat and would have destroyed Darwin's theory and that couldn't be allowed, so the finds were never talked about and either disappeared or were lost in some museum basement somewhere. The archaeologists that found them dare not pursue the fact after their finds were rejected by their peers, for fear that they would be ruined.

Early Cavemen
Photo Source: Stock.xching

Not only were modern skeletons found in ancient soils, but things like beads and carved shells and even carved ivory were found in soils that were anywhere from hundreds of millions of years old down to about 3 million years. I am not going into any finds that were newer than that right now. Along with the human bones many animal bones were found that had been butchered and sometimes the stone tool or flint was found with them. There were cases where the marrow had been extracted out of the bones with a tool and a scratch was left inside the hollow.

Some might say that this sounds ridiculous and cite the fact that the human race could not have existed that long without advancing, but think about this. Apparently, according to the experts, we existed for about one hundred thousand years and only have advanced in technology the last few thousand. This proves that it is possible that man stayed static for about ninety eight thousand years or so, so why not for 365 million years or more? Something or someone turned on a switch of some kind in us, or we would still be hunting down animals and living in caves.

Could it be that someday we will find that this was one of the biggest cover ups in history? What is going on now is that scientists are creating their own view of the development of man and ignoring many of the facts. I will talk about this subject again in the future and more facts will be supplied. Until then try and keep an open mind on how we developed.